Get a free consultation with Solomon & Relihan
We are Arizona-focused and 100% dedicated to nursing home abuse and neglect cases
It can happen in nursing homes, assisted living facilities, memory care units, group homes, rehabilitation centers, and other elder care settings. A resident may leave through an unlocked door, a poorly monitored lobby, an unsecured courtyard gate, an elevator, a stairwell, or a gap in transportation supervision.
Wandering usually refers to confused, repetitive, restless, or aimless movement inside a facility or around the facility grounds. It may include pacing, searching for a room, looking for a family member, trying to “go home,” or becoming agitated near exits.
Elopement usually means the resident leaves a safe or supervised area. Once outside, the resident may be exposed to traffic, weather, dehydration, falls, strangers, missed medications, or delayed emergency care.
Wandering can be an early warning sign. A resident who repeatedly tries to exit, asks to go home, becomes restless near doors, or has previously wandered should be reassessed. Prior wandering may make later elopement foreseeable.
When a resident’s behavior shows a risk of wandering and elopement, staff should not wait until the resident disappears before taking action
Some of the highest-risk residents are able to move independently but cannot safely understand danger. That combination requires careful planning, supervision, and follow-through.
A confused older adult who walks outside in extreme heat may quickly become dehydrated, overheated, disoriented, or medically unstable. They may be unable to find shade, water, transportation, or help. Arizona public health resources recognize that heat-related illness is a serious seasonal danger, and federal nursing home standards require facilities to provide adequate supervision and keep resident environments as free of accident hazards as possible.
Common elopement injuries and harms include:
Solomon & Relihan handles cases involving nursing home injuries, unsafe conditions, dehydration, supervision failures, and wrongful death in nursing homes.
Facilities should take reasonable steps such as:
The key question is often foreseeability: Did the nursing home know, or should it have known, that the resident was at risk of wandering or elopement?
Elopement may be evidence of nursing home abuse or neglect when:
If warning signs were ignored, the resulting harm may support a nursing home neglect, malpractice, injury, or wrongful death claim.
Contact Solomon & Relihan for a free case review if your loved one was injured, hospitalized, traumatized, or died after wandering away from a care facility.
Use this checklist:
For broader guidance on spotting red flags and advocating for better care, families may also review The Nursing Home Survival Guide from Solomon & Relihan.
Some evidence may disappear quickly. Video can be overwritten, memories can fade, and records may be changed or supplemented. An attorney can help preserve the information needed to understand what happened.
F689 is the primary F-tag for elopement and unsafe wandering. It focuses on whether the facility identified foreseeable risks, provided adequate supervision, implemented appropriate interventions, used needed assistive devices or monitoring systems, and modified interventions when they were not working.
F689
42 CFR §483.25(d) Accidents
The facility must ensure that—
(1) The resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible; and
(2) Each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents.
CMS guidance specifically discusses wandering and elopement under F689. CMS defines elopement as a situation in which a resident leaves the premises or a safe area without the facility’s knowledge and supervision, if supervision is necessary, and notes that this creates risks such as heat or cold exposure, dehydration, medical complications, drowning, or being struck by a motor vehicle.
F740 applies when a resident needs behavioral health care or services to maintain or attain their highest practicable well-being. In an elopement or wandering case, this may apply when wandering is connected to dementia, anxiety, depression, trauma, substance use, psychosocial distress, or other behavioral health needs that were not properly assessed or addressed.
F740
42 CFR §483.40 Behavioral Health Services
Each resident must receive and the facility must provide the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. Behavioral health encompasses a resident’s whole emotional and mental well-being, which includes, but is not limited to, the prevention and treatment of mental and substance use disorders.
Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility must ensure that—
(1) A resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder, receives appropriate treatment and services to correct the assessed problem or to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being;
(3) A resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia, receives the appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain his or her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
F741 applies when a facility does not have staff with the competencies and skills needed to care for residents with behavioral health needs. In an elopement or wandering case, this may apply when staff were not trained or competent to supervise residents with dementia, wandering behavior, substance use risk, psychosocial distress, or other conditions that increase elopement risk.
F741
42 CFR §483.40(a) Behavioral Health Services
The facility must have sufficient staff who provide direct services to residents with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care and considering the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility’s resident population in accordance with §483.71.
These competencies and skills sets include, but are not limited to, knowledge of and appropriate training and supervision for:
(1) Caring for residents with mental and psychosocial disorders, as well as residents with a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder, that have been identified in the facility assessment conducted pursuant to §483.71; and
(2) Implementing non-pharmacological interventions.
F584 applies when the resident’s environment is not safe, clean, comfortable, or homelike. In an elopement or wandering case, this may apply when the physical layout, exits, doors, alarms, outdoor areas, supervision points, or accessible hazards create safety risks for residents who wander.
F584
42 CFR §483.10(i) Safe Environment
The resident has a right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely. The facility must provide—
(1) A safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, allowing the resident to use his or her personal belongings to the extent possible.
(i) This includes ensuring that the resident can receive care and services safely and that the physical layout of the facility maximizes resident independence and does not pose a safety risk.
F600 applies when the facts rise to abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment. In an elopement case, this tag should usually be treated as conditional; it is most appropriate when the facility knew, or should have known, that a resident required supervision or elopement precautions and failed to take action.
F600
42 CFR §483.12 Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation
The resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation as defined in this subpart. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident’s medical symptoms.
The facility must—
(1) Not use verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse, corporal punishment, or involuntary seclusion.
CMS guidance notes that noncompliance at F689 does not automatically mean neglect under F600; a neglect citation generally requires additional evidence that the facility knew or should have known what was needed and failed to act.
F605 applies when medication or chemical restraint is used for discipline or staff convenience rather than to treat a resident’s medical symptoms. In wandering or elopement cases, this can be relevant when a facility responds to wandering by sedating the resident instead of assessing the cause and providing appropriate supervision, behavioral interventions, or care planning.
F605
42 CFR §483.12(a)(2) Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation
The facility must—
(2) Ensure that the resident is free from physical or chemical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience and that are not required to treat the resident’s medical symptoms. When the use of restraints is indicated, the facility must use the least restrictive alternative for the least amount of time and document ongoing re-evaluation of the need for restraints.
Wrongful death may be relevant when preventable elopement leads to fatal injury, dehydration, heat stroke, traffic trauma, drowning, or another avoidable death. Every case is fact-specific, and no law firm can guarantee a result.
Solomon & Relihan will review risk assessments, care plans, nursing notes, staffing records, incident reports, alarm logs, surveillance video, medical records, and facility policies to help determine whether the injury or death could have been prevented.
If your loved one wandered away from a nursing home, assisted living facility, or memory care unit in Arizona, families deserve clear answers.
Contact Solomon & Relihan for a free case review.
Elopement means a resident leaves a nursing home, assisted living facility, memory care unit, or supervised area without staff knowledge, authorization, or proper supervision.
No. Wandering usually refers to confused or repetitive movement inside a facility or on facility grounds. Elopement usually means the resident leaves a safe or supervised area and may be exposed to serious danger.
Yes, if the facility knew or should have known that the resident was at risk and failed to take reasonable safety precautions.
Residents with dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, confusion, prior wandering, exit-seeking behavior, medication changes, or a need for close supervision may be at higher risk.
They should assess risk, create and follow care plans, supervise residents, maintain alarms and secure exits, train staff, use appropriate monitoring systems, and respond quickly if a resident is missing.
It can be. Elopement may be evidence of neglect when it results from poor supervision, ignored warning signs, inadequate staffing, broken alarms, unsecured exits, or failure to follow a care plan.
Potentially, yes. If preventable elopement leads to death, surviving family members may have a wrongful death claim under Arizona law. Solomon & Relihan can help families evaluate what happened and what options may be available.